A Comparative Study of Reference Reliability in Multiple Language Editions of Wikipedia
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Information presented in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to reliable published sources in the form of references. This study examines over 5 million Wikipedia articles to assess the reliability of references in multiple language editions. We quantify the cross-lingual patterns of the perennial sources list, a collection of reliability labels for web domains identified and collaboratively agreed upon by Wikipedia editors. We discover that some sources (or web domains) deemed untrustworthy in one language (i.e., English) continue to appear in articles in other languages. This trend is especially evident with sources tailored for smaller communities. Furthermore, non-authoritative sources found in the English version of a page tend to persist in other language versions of that page. We finally present a case study on the Chinese, Russian, and Swedish Wikipedias to demonstrate a discrepancy in reference reliability across cultures. Our finding highlights future challenges in coordinating global knowledge on source reliability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026Multilingual Reference Need Assessment System for Wikipedia17 Mar 2026
- 2024Language-Agnostic Modeling of Source Reliability on Wikipedia24 Oct 2024