mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Consistent and Scalable Composite Likelihood Estimation of Probit Models with Crossed Random Effects

arXiv 2308.15681 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2023stat.ME stat.COcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimation of crossed random effects models commonly requires computational costs that grow faster than linearly in the sample size N, often as fast as Omega(N3/2), making them unsuitable for large data sets. For non-Gaussian responses, integrating out the random effects to get a marginal likelihood brings significant challenges, especially for high dimensional integrals where the Laplace approximation might not be accurate. We develop a composite likelihood approach to probit models that replaces the crossed random effects model with some hierarchical models that require only one-dimensional integrals. We show how to consistently estimate the crossed effects model parameters from the hierarchical model fits. We find that the computation scales linearly in the sample size. We illustrate the method on about five million observations from Stitch Fix where the crossed effects formulation would require an integral of dimension larger than 700,000.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.