The Anatomy of Conspirators: Unveiling Traits using a Comprehensive Twitter Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The discourse around conspiracy theories is currently thriving amidst the rampant misinformation in online environments. Research in this field has been focused on detecting conspiracy theories on social media, often relying on limited datasets. In this study, we present a novel methodology for constructing a Twitter dataset that encompasses accounts engaged in conspiracy-related activities throughout the year 2022. Our approach centers on data collection that is independent of specific conspiracy theories and information operations. Additionally, our dataset includes a control group comprising randomly selected users who can be fairly compared to the individuals involved in conspiracy activities. This comprehensive collection effort yielded a total of 15K accounts and 37M tweets extracted from their timelines. We conduct a comparative analysis of the two groups across three dimensions: topics, profiles, and behavioral characteristics. The results indicate that conspiracy and control users exhibit similarity in terms of their profile metadata characteristics. However, they diverge significantly in terms of behavior and activity, particularly regarding the discussed topics, the terminology used, and their stance on trending subjects. In addition, we find no significant disparity in the presence of bot users between the two groups. Finally, we develop a classifier to identify conspiracy users using features borrowed from bot, troll and linguistic literature. The results demonstrate a high accuracy level (with an F1 score of 0.94), enabling us to uncover the most discriminating features associated with conspiracy-related accounts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.
Builds on
16 of 77 references.
References · 16
- 2018Predicting Factuality of Reporting and Bias of News Media Sourcescited by 71
- 2017Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterizationcited by 64
- 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
- 2015Fame for sale: efficient detection of fake Twitter followerscited by 33
- 2020Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifierscited by 32
- 2020Characterizing COVID-19 Misinformation Communities Using a Novel Twitter Datasetcited by 32
- 2016Anchored Correlation Explanation: Topic Modeling with Minimal Domain Knowledgecited by 23
- 2018Disinformation Warfare: Understanding State-Sponsored Trolls on Twitter and Their Influence on the Webcited by 18
- 2021On the Globalization of the QAnon Conspiracy Theory Through Telegramcited by 14
- 2019Still out there: Modeling and Identifying Russian Troll Accounts on Twittercited by 11
- 2015Debunking in a World of Tribescited by 10
- 2016Personality Traits and Echo Chambers on Facebookcited by 9
4 more
- 2022Twitter Spam and False Accounts Prevalence, Detection and Characterization: A Surveycited by 5
- 2021Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Electioncited by 3
- 2017How well can machine learning predict demographics of social media users?cited by 2
- 2021Detecting Anti-Vaccine Users on Twittercited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.