STEAM: Simulating the InTeractive BEhavior of ProgrAMmers for Automatic Bug Fixing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bug fixing holds significant importance in software development and maintenance. Recent research has made notable progress in exploring the potential of large language models (LLMs) for automatic bug fixing. However, existing studies often overlook the collaborative nature of bug resolution, treating it as a single-stage process. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel stage-wise framework named STEAM in this paper. The objective of STEAM is to simulate the interactive behavior of multiple programmers involved in various stages across the bug's life cycle. Taking inspiration from bug management practices, we decompose the bug fixing task into four distinct stages: bug reporting, bug diagnosis, patch generation, and patch verification. These stages are performed interactively by LLMs, aiming to imitate the collaborative abilities of programmers during the resolution of software bugs. By harnessing the collective contribution, STEAM effectively enhances the bug-fixing capabilities of LLMs. We implement STEAM by employing the powerful dialogue-based LLM -- ChatGPT. Our evaluation on the widely adopted bug-fixing benchmark demonstrates that STEAM has achieved a new state-of-the-art level of bug-fixing performance.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5.
9 papers.
- 2024From Code to Correctness: Closing the Last Mile of Code Generation with Hierarchical Debuggingcited by 46
- 2025An Empirical Study on Failures in Automated Issue Solvingcited by 16
- 2024CigaR: Cost-efficient Program Repair with LLMscited by 15
- 2024Research and application of artificial intelligence based webshell detection model: A literature reviewcited by 4
- 2025AutoPatch: Multi-Agent Framework for Patching Real-World CVE Vulnerabilitiescited by 4
- 2025The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Studycited by 4
- 2024Large Language Models are Few-shot Generators: Proposing Hybrid Prompt Algorithm To Generate Webshell Escape Samplescited by 2
- 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standardscited by 1
- 2025LibRec: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Library Migration Recommendationscited by 0
- 2025An Empirical Study on Failures in Automated Issue Solving17 Sep 2025
- 2025LibRec: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Library Migration Recommendations13 Aug 2025
- 2025The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study3 Jul 2025
- 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards19 May 2025
- 2025AutoPatch: Multi-Agent Framework for Patching Real-World CVE Vulnerabilities7 May 2025
- 2024From Code to Correctness: Closing the Last Mile of Code Generation with Hierarchical Debugging2 Oct 2024
- 2024Research and application of artificial intelligence based webshell detection model: A literature review28 Apr 2024
- 2024Large Language Models are Few-shot Generators: Proposing Hybrid Prompt Algorithm To Generate Webshell Escape Samples12 Feb 2024
- 2024CigaR: Cost-efficient Program Repair with LLMs9 Feb 2024