mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explaining with Attribute-based and Relational Near Misses: An Interpretable Approach to Distinguishing Facial Expressions of Pain and Disgust

arXiv 2308.14163 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explaining concepts by contrasting examples is an efficient and convenient way of giving insights into the reasons behind a classification decision. This is of particular interest in decision-critical domains, such as medical diagnostics. One particular challenging use case is to distinguish facial expressions of pain and other states, such as disgust, due to high similarity of manifestation. In this paper, we present an approach for generating contrastive explanations to explain facial expressions of pain and disgust shown in video sequences. We implement and compare two approaches for contrastive explanation generation. The first approach explains a specific pain instance in contrast to the most similar disgust instance(s) based on the occurrence of facial expressions (attributes). The second approach takes into account which temporal relations hold between intervals of facial expressions within a sequence (relations). The input to our explanation generation approach is the output of an interpretable rule-based classifier for pain and disgust.We utilize two different similarity metrics to determine near misses and far misses as contrasting instances. Our results show that near miss explanations are shorter than far miss explanations, independent from the applied similarity metric. The outcome of our evaluation indicates that pain and disgust can be distinguished with the help of temporal relations. We currently plan experiments to evaluate how the explanations help in teaching concepts and how they could be enhanced by further modalities and interaction.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2023.

Builds on

8 of 44 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  3. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 262
  4. 2017What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?cited by 129
  5. 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 91
  6. 2020Turning 30: New Ideas in Inductive Logic Programmingcited by 42
  7. 2021Generating Contrastive Explanations for Inductive Logic Programming Based on a Near Miss Approachcited by 8
  8. 2018Automated Pain Detection from Facial Expressions using FACS: A Reviewcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.