mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Brain-like representational straightening of natural movies in robust feedforward neural networks

arXiv 2308.13870 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2023q-bio.NC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Representational straightening refers to a decrease in curvature of visual feature representations of a sequence of frames taken from natural movies. Prior work established straightening in neural representations of the primate primary visual cortex (V1) and perceptual straightening in human behavior as a hallmark of biological vision in contrast to artificial feedforward neural networks which did not demonstrate this phenomenon as they were not explicitly optimized to produce temporally predictable movie representations. Here, we show robustness to noise in the input image can produce representational straightening in feedforward neural networks. Both adversarial training (AT) and base classifiers for Random Smoothing (RS) induced remarkably straightened feature codes. Demonstrating their utility within the domain of natural movies, these codes could be inverted to generate intervening movie frames by linear interpolation in the feature space even though they were not trained on these trajectories. Demonstrating their biological utility, we found that AT and RS training improved predictions of neural data in primate V1 over baseline models providing a parsimonious, bio-plausible mechanism -- noise in the sensory input stages -- for generating representations in early visual cortex. Finally, we compared the geometric properties of frame representations in these networks to better understand how they produced representations that mimicked the straightening phenomenon from biology. Overall, this work elucidating emergent properties of robust neural networks demonstrates that it is not necessary to utilize predictive objectives or train directly on natural movie statistics to achieve models supporting straightened movie representations similar to human perception that also predict V1 neural responses.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2023.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  5. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  7. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
  8. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  9. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 257
  10. 2016Deep Predictive Coding Networks for Video Prediction and Unsupervised Learningcited by 204
  11. 2018i-RevNet: Deep Invertible Networkscited by 137
  12. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
5 more
  1. 2021Predictive Coding: a Theoretical and Experimental Reviewcited by 77
  2. 2018Excessive Invariance Causes Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 66
  3. 2020Deep Analysis of CNN-based Spatio-temporal Representations for Action Recognitioncited by 45
  4. 2015Learning to Linearize Under Uncertaintycited by 25
  5. 2019Adversarial Robustness as a Prior for Learned Representationscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.