mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Bayesian Active Learning Approach to Comparative Judgement

arXiv 2308.13292 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CY cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessment is a crucial part of education. Traditional marking is a source of inconsistencies and unconscious bias, placing a high cognitive load on the assessors. An approach to address these issues is comparative judgement (CJ). In CJ, the assessor is presented with a pair of items and is asked to select the better one. Following a series of comparisons, a rank is derived using a ranking model, for example, the BTM, based on the results. While CJ is considered a reliable method for marking, there are concerns around transparency, and the ideal number of pairwise comparisons to generate a reliable estimation of the rank order is not known. Additionally, there have been attempts to generate a method of selecting pairs that should be compared next in an informative manner, but some existing methods are known to have created their own bias within results inflating the reliability metric used. As a result, a random selection approach is usually deployed. We propose a novel Bayesian approach to CJ (BCJ) for determining the ranks of compared items alongside a new way to select the pairs to present to the marker(s) using active learning (AL), addressing the key shortcomings of traditional CJ. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the entire approach may provide transparency by providing the user insights into how it is making its decisions and, at the same time, being more efficient. Results from our experiments confirm that the proposed BCJ combined with entropy-driven AL pair-selection method is superior to other alternatives. We also find that the more comparisons done, the more accurate BCJ becomes, which solves the issue the current method has of the model deteriorating if too many comparisons are performed. As our approach can generate the complete predicted rank distribution for an item, we also show how this can be utilised in devising a predicted grade, guided by the assessor.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2023.

Builds on

4 of 94 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022A Bayesian Bradley-Terry model to compare multiple ML algorithms on multiple data setscited by 9
  2. 2022Jensen-Shannon Divergence Based Novel Loss Functions for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 6
  3. 2022Using Elo Rating as a Metric for Comparative Judgement in Educational Assessmentcited by 3
  4. 2017Machine Learning Based Student Grade Prediction: A Case Studycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.