An Intentional Forgetting-Driven Self-Healing Method For Deep Reinforcement Learning Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is increasingly applied in large-scale productions like Netflix and Facebook. As with most data-driven systems, DRL systems can exhibit undesirable behaviors due to environmental drifts, which often occur in constantly-changing production settings. Continual Learning (CL) is the inherent self-healing approach for adapting the DRL agent in response to the environment's conditions shifts. However, successive shifts of considerable magnitude may cause the production environment to drift from its original state. Recent studies have shown that these environmental drifts tend to drive CL into long, or even unsuccessful, healing cycles, which arise from inefficiencies such as catastrophic forgetting, warm-starting failure, and slow convergence. In this paper, we propose Dr. DRL, an effective self-healing approach for DRL systems that integrates a novel mechanism of intentional forgetting into vanilla CL to overcome its main issues. Dr. DRL deliberately erases the DRL system's minor behaviors to systematically prioritize the adaptation of the key problem-solving skills. Using well-established DRL algorithms, Dr. DRL is compared with vanilla CL on various drifted environments. Dr. DRL is able to reduce, on average, the healing time and fine-tuning episodes by, respectively, 18.74% and 17.72%. Dr. DRL successfully helps agents to adapt to 19.63% of drifted environments left unsolved by vanilla CL while maintaining and even enhancing by up to 45% the obtained rewards for drifted environments that are resolved by both approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.
Builds on
24 of 72 references.
References · 24
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,152
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
- 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 282
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 268
12 more
- 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 242
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
- 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 124
- 2015Characterizing Concept Driftcited by 93
- 2019AlphaStar: An Evolutionary Computation Perspectivecited by 50
- 2018Horizon: Facebook's Open Source Applied Reinforcement Learning Platformcited by 48
- 2022Architecture Matters in Continual Learningcited by 46
- 2018Automatic Software Repair: a Bibliographycited by 24
- 2021RLOps: Development Life-cycle of Reinforcement Learning Aided Open RANcited by 15
- 2021Intentional Forgettingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.