Neurological Prognostication of Post-Cardiac-Arrest Coma Patients Using EEG Data: A Dynamic Survival Analysis Framework with Competing Risks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who enter a coma are at high risk of death. Forecasting neurological outcomes of these patients (the task of neurological prognostication) could help with treatment decisions. In this paper, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first dynamic framework for neurological prognostication of post-cardiac-arrest comatose patients using EEG data: our framework makes predictions for a patient over time as more EEG data become available, and different training patients' available EEG time series could vary in length. Predictions are phrased in terms of either time-to-event outcomes (time-to-awakening or time-to-death) or as the patient's probability of awakening or of dying across multiple time horizons. Our framework uses any dynamic survival analysis model that supports competing risks in the form of estimating patient-level cumulative incidence functions. We consider three competing risks as to what happens first to a patient: awakening, being withdrawn from life-sustaining therapies (and thus deterministically dying), or dying (by other causes). We demonstrate our framework by benchmarking three existing dynamic survival analysis models that support competing risks on a real dataset of 922 patients. Our main experimental findings are that: (1) the classical Fine and Gray model which only uses a patient's static features and summary statistics from the patient's latest hour's worth of EEG data is highly competitive, achieving accuracy scores as high as the recently developed Dynamic-DeepHit model that uses substantially more of the patient's EEG data; and (2) in an ablation study, we show that our choice of modeling three competing risks results in a model that is at least as accurate while learning more information than simpler models (using two competing risks or a standard survival analysis setup with no competing risks).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.
Builds on
2 of 32 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024An Introduction to Deep Survival Analysis Models for Predicting Time-to-Event Outcomescited by 16
- 2024Dynamic Survival Analysis for Early Event Predictioncited by 5
- 2025Stepwise Fine and Gray: Subject-Specific Variable Selection Shows When Hemodynamic Data Improves Prognostication of Comatose Post-Cardiac Arrest Patientscited by 1
- 2025A meaningful prediction of functional decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis based on multi-event survival analysiscited by 0
- 2026Learning Under Treatment-Induced Label Indeterminacy with Expert Annotations of Counterfactual Outcomes: A Case Study in Neurological Prognosticationcited by 0
- 2026Learning Under Treatment-Induced Label Indeterminacy with Expert Annotations of Counterfactual Outcomes: A Case Study in Neurological Prognostication12 Aug 2026
- 2025Stepwise Fine and Gray: Subject-Specific Variable Selection Shows When Hemodynamic Data Improves Prognostication of Comatose Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients8 Aug 2025
- 2025A meaningful prediction of functional decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis based on multi-event survival analysis2 Jun 2025
- 2024An Introduction to Deep Survival Analysis Models for Predicting Time-to-Event Outcomes1 Oct 2024
- 2024Dynamic Survival Analysis for Early Event Prediction19 Mar 2024