mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EM for Mixture of Linear Regression with Clustered Data

arXiv 2308.11518 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern data-driven and distributed learning frameworks deal with diverse massive data generated by clients spread across heterogeneous environments. Indeed, data heterogeneity is a major bottleneck in scaling up many distributed learning paradigms. In many settings however, heterogeneous data may be generated in clusters with shared structures, as is the case in several applications such as federated learning where a common latent variable governs the distribution of all the samples generated by a client. It is therefore natural to ask how the underlying clustered structures in distributed data can be exploited to improve learning schemes. In this paper, we tackle this question in the special case of estimating d-dimensional parameters of a two-component mixture of linear regressions problem where each of m nodes generates n samples with a shared latent variable. We employ the well-known Expectation-Maximization (EM) method to estimate the maximum likelihood parameters from m batches of dependent samples each containing n measurements. Discarding the clustered structure in the mixture model, EM is known to require O(log(mn/d)) iterations to reach the statistical accuracy of O(√d/(mn)). In contrast, we show that if initialized properly, EM on the structured data requires only O(1) iterations to reach the same statistical accuracy, as long as m grows up as eo(n). Our analysis establishes and combines novel asymptotic optimization and generalization guarantees for population and empirical EM with dependent samples, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  3. 2014Statistical guarantees for the EM algorithm: From population to sample-based analysiscited by 131
  4. 2018Gradient Descent with Random Initialization: Fast Global Convergence for Nonconvex Phase Retrievalcited by 71
  5. 2016Ten Steps of EM Suffice for Mixtures of Two Gaussianscited by 40
  6. 2018Learning Mixtures of Linear Regressions with Nearly Optimal Complexitycited by 37
  7. 2016Global analysis of Expectation Maximization for mixtures of two Gaussianscited by 31
  8. 2019EM Converges for a Mixture of Many Linear Regressionscited by 27
  9. 2019Randomly initialized EM algorithm for two-component Gaussian mixture achieves near optimality in O(√n) iterationscited by 27
  10. 2020Model-Based Robust Deep Learning: Generalizing to Natural, Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 27
  11. 2016Solving a Mixture of Many Random Linear Equations by Tensor Decomposition and Alternating Minimizationcited by 26
  12. 2019Learning Mixtures of Linear Regressions in Subexponential Time via Fourier Momentscited by 26
6 more
  1. 2018Global Convergence of EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regressioncited by 25
  2. 2020On the Minimax Optimality of the EM Algorithm for Learning Two-Component Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 24
  3. 2015Regularized EM Algorithms: A Unified Framework and Statistical Guaranteescited by 19
  4. 2017Estimating the Coefficients of a Mixture of Two Linear Regressions by Expectation Maximizationcited by 19
  5. 2020Alternating Minimization Converges Super-Linearly for Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 12
  6. 2021A Wasserstein Minimax Framework for Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.