Benchmarking Domain Adaptation for Chemical Processes on the Tennessee Eastman Process
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In system monitoring, automatic fault diagnosis seeks to infer the systems' state based on sensor readings, e.g., through machine learning models. In this context, it is of key importance that, based on historical data, these systems are able to generalize to incoming data. In parallel, many factors may induce changes in the data probability distribution, hindering the possibility of such models to generalize. In this sense, domain adaptation is an important framework for adapting models to different probability distributions. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark, based on the Tennessee Eastman Process of Downs and Vogel (1993), for benchmarking domain adaptation methods in the context of chemical processes. Besides describing the process, and its relevance for domain adaptation, we describe a series of data processing steps for reproducing our benchmark. We then test 11 domain adaptation strategies on this novel benchmark, showing that optimal transport-based techniques outperform other strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.
Builds on
16 of 35 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 457
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
- 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 280
- 2018DeepJDOT: Deep Joint Distribution Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 212
- 2020A Survey on Negative Transfercited by 120
4 more
- 2023Recent Advances in Optimal Transport for Machine Learningcited by 66
- 2014Domain Adaptive Neural Networks for Object Recognitioncited by 51
- 2020Multi-source Domain Adaptation via Weighted Joint Distributions Optimal Transportcited by 28
- 2023Multi-Source Domain Adaptation through Dataset Dictionary Learning in Wasserstein Spacecited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Federated Dataset Dictionary Learning for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 4
- 2025Unsupervised Anomaly Detection through Mass Repulsing Optimal Transportcited by 4
- 2024Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation through Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 3
- 2025Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Scalable and Regularized Barycenter Computationcited by 1
- 2025Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Scalable and Regularized Barycenter Computation6 Oct 2025
- 2025Unsupervised Anomaly Detection through Mass Repulsing Optimal Transport18 Feb 2025
- 2024Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation through Gaussian Mixture Models18 Mar 2024
- 2023Federated Dataset Dictionary Learning for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation14 Sep 2023