mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Objective Evaluation of Socially-Situated Conversational Robots: Assessing Human-Likeness through Multimodal User Behaviors

arXiv 2308.11020 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2023cs.CL cs.HC cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper tackles the challenging task of evaluating socially situated conversational robots and presents a novel objective evaluation approach that relies on multimodal user behaviors. In this study, our main focus is on assessing the human-likeness of the robot as the primary evaluation metric. While previous research often relied on subjective evaluations from users, our approach aims to evaluate the robot's human-likeness based on observable user behaviors indirectly, thus enhancing objectivity and reproducibility. To begin, we created an annotated dataset of human-likeness scores, utilizing user behaviors found in an attentive listening dialogue corpus. We then conducted an analysis to determine the correlation between multimodal user behaviors and human-likeness scores, demonstrating the feasibility of our proposed behavior-based evaluation method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2023.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Recent Advances in Deep Learning Based Dialogue Systems: A Systematic Surveycited by 130
  2. 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
  3. 2021Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domain Dialogue Systemscited by 28
  4. 2022Duplex Conversation: Towards Human-like Interaction in Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 28

Built on by

Not cited yet.