mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Foundation Model-oriented Robustness: Robust Image Model Evaluation with Pretrained Models

arXiv 2308.10632 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has demonstrated remarkable performance over finite datasets, yet whether the scores over the fixed benchmarks can sufficiently indicate the model's performance in the real world is still in discussion. In reality, an ideal robust model will probably behave similarly to the oracle (e.g., the human users), thus a good evaluation protocol is probably to evaluate the models' behaviors in comparison to the oracle. In this paper, we introduce a new robustness measurement that directly measures the image classification model's performance compared with a surrogate oracle (i.e., a foundation model). Besides, we design a simple method that can accomplish the evaluation beyond the scope of the benchmarks. Our method extends the image datasets with new samples that are sufficiently perturbed to be distinct from the ones in the original sets, but are still bounded within the same image-label structure the original test image represents, constrained by a foundation model pretrained with a large amount of samples. As a result, our new method will offer us a new way to evaluate the models' robustness performance, free of limitations of fixed benchmarks or constrained perturbations, although scoped by the power of the oracle. In addition to the evaluation results, we also leverage our generated data to understand the behaviors of the model and our new evaluation strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 84 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2023.

Builds on

84 of 113 references.

References · 84

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  8. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  9. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
  10. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  11. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  12. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
38 more
  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  4. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  6. 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
  7. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  9. 2020Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 3,253
  10. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  11. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  13. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  14. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  15. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  16. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  17. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  18. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  19. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  20. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  21. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  22. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  23. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  24. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  25. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  26. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  27. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  28. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  29. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
  30. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  31. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  32. 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 492
  33. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  34. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  35. 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
  36. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  37. 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 402
  38. 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 391

50 most cited of 84 All 84 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4.

6 papers.