Engaged and Affective Virtual Agents: Their Impact on Social Presence, Trustworthiness, and Decision-Making in the Group Discussion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study investigates how different virtual agent (VA) behaviors influence subjects' perceptions and group decision-making. Participants carried out experimental group discussions with a VA exhibiting varying levels of engagement and affective behavior. Engagement refers to the VA's focus on the group task, whereas affective behavior reflects the VA's emotional state. The findings revealed that VA's engagements effectively captured participants' attention even in the group setting and enhanced group synergy, thereby facilitating more in-depth discussion and producing better consensus. On the other hand, VA's affective behavior negatively affected the perceived social presence and trustworthiness. Consequently, in the context of group discussion, participants preferred the engaged and non-affective VA to the non-engaged and affective VA. The study provides valuable insights for improving the VA's behavioral design as a team member for collaborative tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactionscited by 16
- 2025Co-designing Large Language Model Tools for Project-Based Learning with K12 Educatorscited by 5
- 2025Can LLMs Generate Behaviors for Embodied Virtual Agents Based on Personality Traits?cited by 5
- 2025Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of Workcited by 3
- 2025Adaptive Human-Agent Teaming: A Review of Empirical Studies from the Process Dynamics Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025"Shall We Dig Deeper?": Designing and Evaluating Strategies for LLM Agents to Advance Knowledge Co-Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussionscited by 1
- 2026Can You Say This for Me? Speaking Up by Proxy in Co-Located Discussioncited by 0
- 2026Can You Say This for Me? Speaking Up by Proxy in Co-Located Discussion22 Aug 2026
- 2025"Shall We Dig Deeper?": Designing and Evaluating Strategies for LLM Agents to Advance Knowledge Co-Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussions27 Sep 2025
- 2025Can LLMs Generate Behaviors for Embodied Virtual Agents Based on Personality Traits?27 Aug 2025
- 2025Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of Work21 Apr 2025
- 2025Adaptive Human-Agent Teaming: A Review of Empirical Studies from the Process Dynamics Perspective15 Apr 2025
- 2025Co-designing Large Language Model Tools for Project-Based Learning with K12 Educators13 Feb 2025
- 2024Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactions7 Nov 2024