Generic Attention-model Explainability by Weighted Relevance Accumulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attention-based transformer models have achieved remarkable progress in multi-modal tasks, such as visual question answering. The explainability of attention-based methods has recently attracted wide interest as it can explain the inner changes of attention tokens by accumulating relevancy across attention layers. Current methods simply update relevancy by equally accumulating the token relevancy before and after the attention processes. However, the importance of token values is usually different during relevance accumulation. In this paper, we propose a weighted relevancy strategy, which takes the importance of token values into consideration, to reduce distortion when equally accumulating relevance. To evaluate our method, we propose a unified CLIP-based two-stage model, named CLIPmapper, to process Vision-and-Language tasks through CLIP encoder and a following mapper. CLIPmapper consists of self-attention, cross-attention, single-modality, and cross-modality attention, thus it is more suitable for evaluating our generic explainability method. Extensive perturbation tests on visual question answering and image captioning validate that our explainability method outperforms existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2023.
Builds on
35 of 41 references.
References · 35
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
23 more
- 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,296
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
- 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
- 2021How Much Can CLIP Benefit Vision-and-Language Tasks?cited by 321
- 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 320
- 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
- 2022A Survey of Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelscited by 177
- 2022VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 159
- 2022CLIP Models are Few-shot Learners: Empirical Studies on VQA and Visual Entailmentcited by 113
- 2017Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challengecited by 76
- 2021Vision-and-Language or Vision-for-Language? On Cross-Modal Influence in Multimodal Transformerscited by 72
- 2020Multimodal Pretraining Unmasked: A Meta-Analysis and a Unified Framework of Vision-and-Language BERTscited by 71
- 2022Rethinking Attention-Model Explainability through Faithfulness Violation Testcited by 43
- 2022DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanationscited by 34
- 2020One Explanation is Not Enough: Structured Attention Graphs for Image Classificationcited by 32
- 2020Can images help recognize entities? A study of the role of images for Multimodal NERcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.