mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FRGNN: Mitigating the Impact of Distribution Shift on Graph Neural Networks via Test-Time Feature Reconstruction

arXiv 2308.09259 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to inappropriate sample selection and limited training data, a distribution shift often exists between the training and test sets. This shift can adversely affect the test performance of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Existing approaches mitigate this issue by either enhancing the robustness of GNNs to distribution shift or reducing the shift itself. However, both approaches necessitate retraining the model, which becomes unfeasible when the model structure and parameters are inaccessible. To address this challenge, we propose FR-GNN, a general framework for GNNs to conduct feature reconstruction. FRGNN constructs a mapping relationship between the output and input of a well-trained GNN to obtain class representative embeddings and then uses these embeddings to reconstruct the features of labeled nodes. These reconstructed features are then incorporated into the message passing mechanism of GNNs to influence the predictions of unlabeled nodes at test time. Notably, the reconstructed node features can be directly utilized for testing the well-trained model, effectively reducing the distribution shift and leading to improved test performance. This remarkable achievement is attained without any modifications to the model structure or parameters. We provide theoretical guarantees for the effectiveness of our framework. Furthermore, we conduct comprehensive experiments on various public datasets. The experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of FRGNN in comparison to multiple categories of baseline methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  5. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  6. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
  7. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 493
  8. 2020Data Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 200
  9. 2021A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Recommender Systems: Challenges, Methods, and Directionscited by 144
  10. 2022Out-Of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs: A Surveycited by 97
  11. 2021Shift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training Datacited by 86
  12. 2022Empowering Graph Representation Learning with Test-Time Graph Transformationcited by 66
4 more
  1. 2021Local Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 52
  2. 2022Metropolis-Hastings Data Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
  3. 2022Debiased Graph Neural Networks with Agnostic Label Selection Biascited by 25
  4. 2022Adversarial Weight Perturbation Improves Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.