mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Does Pruning Impact Long-Tailed Multi-Label Medical Image Classifiers?

arXiv 2308.09180 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pruning has emerged as a powerful technique for compressing deep neural networks, reducing memory usage and inference time without significantly affecting overall performance. However, the nuanced ways in which pruning impacts model behavior are not well understood, particularly for long-tailed, multi-label datasets commonly found in clinical settings. This knowledge gap could have dangerous implications when deploying a pruned model for diagnosis, where unexpected model behavior could impact patient well-being. To fill this gap, we perform the first analysis of pruning's effect on neural networks trained to diagnose thorax diseases from chest X-rays (CXRs). On two large CXR datasets, we examine which diseases are most affected by pruning and characterize class "forgettability" based on disease frequency and co-occurrence behavior. Further, we identify individual CXRs where uncompressed and heavily pruned models disagree, known as pruning-identified exemplars (PIEs), and conduct a human reader study to evaluate their unifying qualities. We find that radiologists perceive PIEs as having more label noise, lower image quality, and higher diagnosis difficulty. This work represents a first step toward understanding the impact of pruning on model behavior in deep long-tailed, multi-label medical image classification. All code, model weights, and data access instructions can be found at https://github.com/VITA-Group/PruneCXR.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  4. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  5. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
  6. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  7. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  8. 2017CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learningcited by 459
  9. 2020A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promisescited by 230
  10. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 164
  11. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  12. 2022FairPrune: Achieving Fairness Through Pruning for Dermatological Disease Diagnosiscited by 59
9 more
  1. 2021Self-Damaging Contrastive Learningcited by 48
  2. 2022Long-Tailed Classification of Thorax Diseases on Chest X-Ray: A New Benchmark Studycited by 45
  3. 2020Data-Efficient Pretraining via Contrastive Self-Supervisioncited by 14
  4. 2022GMP*: Well-Tuned Gradual Magnitude Pruning Can Outperform Most BERT-Pruning Methodscited by 14
  5. 2022The Lighter The Better: Rethinking Transformers in Medical Image Segmentation Through Adaptive Pruningcited by 9
  6. 2022Radiomics-Guided Global-Local Transformer for Weakly Supervised Pathology Localization in Chest X-Rayscited by 7
  7. 2022Deep Neural Network Pruning for Nuclei Instance Segmentation in Hematoxylin & Eosin-Stained Histological Imagescited by 5
  8. 2022Sauron U-Net: Simple automated redundancy elimination in medical image segmentation via filter pruningcited by 5
  9. 2022Attend Who is Weak: Pruning-assisted Medical Image Localization under Sophisticated and Implicit Imbalancescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.