mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamic Embedding Size Search with Minimum Regret for Streaming Recommender System

arXiv 2308.07760 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2023cs.IR cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the continuous increase of users and items, conventional recommender systems trained on static datasets can hardly adapt to changing environments. The high-throughput data requires the model to be updated in a timely manner for capturing the user interest dynamics, which leads to the emergence of streaming recommender systems. Due to the prevalence of deep learning-based recommender systems, the embedding layer is widely adopted to represent the characteristics of users, items, and other features in low-dimensional vectors. However, it has been proved that setting an identical and static embedding size is sub-optimal in terms of recommendation performance and memory cost, especially for streaming recommendations. To tackle this problem, we first rethink the streaming model update process and model the dynamic embedding size search as a bandit problem. Then, we analyze and quantify the factors that influence the optimal embedding sizes from the statistics perspective. Based on this, we propose the Dynamic Embedding Size Search (DESS) method to minimize the embedding size selection regret on both user and item sides in a non-stationary manner. Theoretically, we obtain a sublinear regret upper bound superior to previous methods. Empirical results across two recommendation tasks on four public datasets also demonstrate that our approach can achieve better streaming recommendation performance with lower memory cost and higher time efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
  2. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
  3. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 837
  4. 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 661
  5. 2016Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filteringcited by 520
  6. 2018SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Searchcited by 289
  7. 2017SMASH: One-Shot Model Architecture Search through HyperNetworkscited by 202
  8. 2018Neural Architecture Optimizationcited by 167
  9. 2019Weighted Linear Bandits for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 86
  10. 2020Streaming Graph Neural Networks via Continual Learningcited by 64
  11. 2021A Simple Approach for Non-stationary Linear Banditscited by 54
  12. 2020AutoEmb: Automated Embedding Dimensionality Search in Streaming Recommendationscited by 47
16 more
  1. 2020Understanding Training Efficiency of Deep Learning Recommendation Models at Scalecited by 43
  2. 2021Learnable Embedding Sizes for Recommender Systemscited by 42
  3. 2019Mixed Dimension Embeddings with Application to Memory-Efficient Recommendation Systemscited by 41
  4. 2019Neural Input Search for Large Scale Recommendation Modelscited by 39
  5. 2020Robust Sub-Gaussian Principal Component Analysis and Width-Independent Schatten Packingcited by 35
  6. 2018Learning Contextual Bandits in a Non-stationary Environmentcited by 26
  7. 2023Dynamically Expandable Graph Convolution for Streaming Recommendationcited by 26
  8. 2020Learning Multi-granular Quantized Embeddings for Large-Vocab Categorical Features in Recommender Systemscited by 24
  9. 2019Randomized Exploration for Non-Stationary Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 18
  10. 2016Streaming Recommender Systemscited by 17
  11. 2020Differentiable Neural Input Search for Recommender Systemscited by 16
  12. 2022OptEmbed: Learning Optimal Embedding Table for Click-through Rate Predictioncited by 14
  13. 2015Dynamic Matrix Factorization with Priors on Unknown Valuescited by 11
  14. 2021Probabilistic Metric Learning with Adaptive Margin for Top-K Recommendationcited by 11
  15. 2023Sim2Rec: A Simulator-based Decision-making Approach to Optimize Real-World Long-term User Engagement in Sequential Recommender Systemscited by 5
  16. 2019A Generalization of Principal Component Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

7 papers.