BSED: Baseline Shapley-Based Explainable Detector
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has witnessed significant advances in the field of object recognition, with saliency maps being used to highlight image features relevant to the predictions of learned models. Although these advances have made AI-based technology more interpretable to humans, several issues have come to light. Some approaches present explanations irrelevant to predictions, and cannot guarantee the validity of XAI (axioms). In this study, we propose the Baseline Shapley-based Explainable Detector (BSED), which extends the Shapley value to object detection, thereby enhancing the validity of interpretation. The Shapley value can attribute the prediction of a learned model to a baseline feature while satisfying the explainability axioms. The processing cost for the BSED is within the reasonable range, while the original Shapley value is prohibitively computationally expensive. Furthermore, BSED is a generalizable method that can be applied to various detectors in a model-agnostic manner, and interpret various detection targets without fine-grained parameter tuning. These strengths can enable the practical applicability of XAI. We present quantitative and qualitative comparisons with existing methods to demonstrate the superior performance of our method in terms of explanation validity. Moreover, we present some applications, such as correcting detection based on explanations from our method.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.
Builds on
29 of 41 references.
References · 29
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
17 more
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
- 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 123
- 2020Black-box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Mapscited by 74
- 2018Understanding Individual Decisions of CNNs via Contrastive Backpropagationcited by 40
- 2022Shap-CAM: Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks based on Shapley Valuecited by 23
- 2022Do Explanations Explain? Model Knows Bestcited by 20
- 2022Revealing Hidden Context Bias in Segmentation and Object Detection through Concept-specific Explanationscited by 17
- 2022OccAM's Laser: Occlusion-based Attribution Maps for 3D Object Detectors on LiDAR Datacited by 13
- 2018Explain to Fix: A Framework to Interpret and Correct DNN Object Detector Predictionscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Explaining Object Detectors via Collective Contribution of Pixelscited by 3
- 2024Directly Handling Missing Data in Linear Discriminant Analysis for Enhancing Classification Accuracy and Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2024Improving Object Detection by Modifying Synthetic Data with Explainable AIcited by 0
- 2024Improving Object Detection by Modifying Synthetic Data with Explainable AI2 Dec 2024
- 2024Explaining Object Detectors via Collective Contribution of Pixels1 Dec 2024
- 2024Directly Handling Missing Data in Linear Discriminant Analysis for Enhancing Classification Accuracy and Interpretability30 Jun 2024