mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contrastive Bi-Projector for Unsupervised Domain Adaption

arXiv 2308.07017 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a novel unsupervised domain adaption (UDA) method based on contrastive bi-projector (CBP), which can improve the existing UDA methods. It is called CBPUDA here, which effectively promotes the feature extractors (FEs) to reduce the generation of ambiguous features for classification and domain adaption. The CBP differs from traditional bi-classifier-based methods at that these two classifiers are replaced with two projectors of performing a mapping from the input feature to two distinct features. These two projectors and the FEs in the CBPUDA can be trained adversarially to obtain more refined decision boundaries so that it can possess powerful classification performance. Two properties of the proposed loss function are analyzed here. The first property is to derive an upper bound of joint prediction entropy, which is used to form the proposed loss function, contrastive discrepancy (CD) loss. The CD loss takes the advantages of the contrastive learning and the bi-classifier. The second property is to analyze the gradient of the CD loss and then overcome the drawback of the CD loss. The result of the second property is utilized in the development of the gradient scaling (GS) scheme in this paper. The GS scheme can be exploited to tackle the unstable problem of the CD loss because training the CBPUDA requires using contrastive learning and adversarial learning at the same time. Therefore, using the CD loss with the GS scheme overcomes the problem mentioned above to make features more compact for intra-class and distinguishable for inter-class. Experimental results express that the CBPUDA is superior to conventional UDA methods under consideration in this paper for UDA and fine-grained UDA tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  5. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  6. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  7. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  8. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 682
  9. 2020Contrastive Learning for Unpaired Image-to-Image Translationcited by 637
  10. 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 562
  11. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 432
  12. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
10 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixupcited by 250
  2. 2015An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnosticscited by 132
  3. 2021Deep Subdomain Adaptation Network for Image Classificationcited by 119
  4. 2020Maximum Density Divergence for Domain Adaptationcited by 76
  5. 2021Rebooting ACGAN: Auxiliary Classifier GANs with Stable Trainingcited by 57
  6. 2020Bi-Classifier Determinacy Maximization for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 35
  7. 2020Discriminative Feature Alignment: Improving Transferability of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Gaussian-guided Latent Alignmentcited by 24
  8. 2022Multi-Representation Adaptation Network for Cross-domain Image Classificationcited by 19
  9. 2020The Plant Pathology 2020 challenge dataset to classify foliar disease of applescited by 14
  10. 2022Cycle Label-Consistent Networks for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.