How inter-rater variability relates to aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty: a case study with deep learning-based paraspinal muscle segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent developments in deep learning (DL) techniques have led to great performance improvement in medical image segmentation tasks, especially with the latest Transformer model and its variants. While labels from fusing multi-rater manual segmentations are often employed as ideal ground truths in DL model training, inter-rater variability due to factors such as training bias, image noise, and extreme anatomical variability can still affect the performance and uncertainty of the resulting algorithms. Knowledge regarding how inter-rater variability affects the reliability of the resulting DL algorithms, a key element in clinical deployment, can help inform better training data construction and DL models, but has not been explored extensively. In this paper, we measure aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties using test-time augmentation (TTA), test-time dropout (TTD), and deep ensemble to explore their relationship with inter-rater variability. Furthermore, we compare UNet and TransUNet to study the impacts of Transformers on model uncertainty with two label fusion strategies. We conduct a case study using multi-class paraspinal muscle segmentation from T2w MRIs. Our study reveals the interplay between inter-rater variability and uncertainties, affected by choices of label fusion strategies and DL models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
References · 14
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
- 2019DropConnect Is Effective in Modeling Uncertainty of Bayesian Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2021Recalibration of Aleatoric and Epistemic Regression Uncertainty in Medical Imagingcited by 18
- 2022Label fusion and training methods for reliable representation of inter-rater uncertaintycited by 13
- 2019Characterizing Sources of Uncertainty to Proxy Calibration and Disambiguate Annotator and Data Biascited by 11
- 2022Rethinking Generalization: The Impact of Annotation Style on Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentationcited by 6
- 2024Reliability of deep learning models for anatomical landmark detection: The role of inter-rater variabilitycited by 1
- 2026Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Anatomical Feature Learning via Diffusion Models: Enhanced Medical Image Segmentation with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Anatomical Feature Learning via Diffusion Models: Enhanced Medical Image Segmentation with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models26 Aug 2026
- 2026Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models in Medical Image Segmentation17 Jun 2026
- 2024Reliability of deep learning models for anatomical landmark detection: The role of inter-rater variability26 Nov 2024
- 2024A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentation25 Nov 2024