Leveraging multi-view data without annotations for prostate MRI segmentation: A contrastive approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An accurate prostate delineation and volume characterization can support the clinical assessment of prostate cancer. A large amount of automatic prostate segmentation tools consider exclusively the axial MRI direction in spite of the availability as per acquisition protocols of multi-view data. Further, when multi-view data is exploited, manual annotations and availability at test time for all the views is commonly assumed. In this work, we explore a contrastive approach at training time to leverage multi-view data without annotations and provide flexibility at deployment time in the event of missing views. We propose a triplet encoder and single decoder network based on U-Net, tU-Net (triplet U-Net). Our proposed architecture is able to exploit non-annotated sagittal and coronal views via contrastive learning to improve the segmentation from a volumetric perspective. For that purpose, we introduce the concept of inter-view similarity in the latent space. To guide the training, we combine a dice score loss calculated with respect to the axial view and its manual annotations together with a multi-view contrastive loss. tU-Net shows statistical improvement in dice score coefficient (DSC) with respect to only axial view (91.25+-0.52% compared to 86.40+-1.50%,P<.001). Sensitivity analysis reveals the volumetric positive impact of the contrastive loss when paired with tU-Net (2.85+-1.34% compared to 3.81+-1.88%,P<.001). Further, our approach shows good external volumetric generalization in an in-house dataset when tested with multi-view data (2.76+-1.89% compared to 3.92+-3.31%,P=.002), showing the feasibility of exploiting non-annotated multi-view data through contrastive learning whilst providing flexibility at deployment in the event of missing views.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2023.
Builds on
6 of 25 references.
References · 6
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
- 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
- 2021Improving prostate whole gland segmentation in t2-weighted MRI with synthetically generated datacited by 5
- 2020Anisotropic 3D Multi-Stream CNN for Accurate Prostate Segmentation from Multi-Planar MRIcited by 2
- 2023Prostate Age Gap (PAG): An MRI surrogate marker of aging for prostate cancer detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023On undesired emergent behaviors in compound prostate cancer detection systemscited by 1
- 2025MOSAIC: A Multi-View 2.5D Organ Slice Selector with Cross-Attentional Reasoning for Anatomically-Aware CT Localization in Medical Organ Segmentationcited by 1
- 2026Neuropsychiatric Deviations From Normative Profiles: An MRI-Derived Marker for Early Alzheimer's Disease Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Neuropsychiatric Deviations From Normative Profiles: An MRI-Derived Marker for Early Alzheimer's Disease Detection1 Apr 2026
- 2025MOSAIC: A Multi-View 2.5D Organ Slice Selector with Cross-Attentional Reasoning for Anatomically-Aware CT Localization in Medical Organ Segmentation15 May 2025
- 2023On undesired emergent behaviors in compound prostate cancer detection systems15 Sep 2023