mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Defensive Perception: Estimation and Monitoring of Neural Network Performance under Deployment

arXiv 2308.06299 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a method for addressing the issue of unnoticed catastrophic deployment and domain shift in neural networks for semantic segmentation in autonomous driving. Our approach is based on the idea that deep learning-based perception for autonomous driving is uncertain and best represented as a probability distribution. As autonomous vehicles' safety is paramount, it is crucial for perception systems to recognize when the vehicle is leaving its operational design domain, anticipate hazardous uncertainty, and reduce the performance of the perception system. To address this, we propose to encapsulate the neural network under deployment within an uncertainty estimation envelope that is based on the epistemic uncertainty estimation through the Monte Carlo Dropout approach. This approach does not require modification of the deployed neural network and guarantees expected model performance. Our defensive perception envelope has the capability to estimate a neural network's performance, enabling monitoring and notification of entering domains of reduced neural network performance under deployment. Furthermore, our envelope is extended by novel methods to improve the application in deployment settings, including reducing compute expenses and confining estimation noise. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of our method for multiple different potential deployment shifts relevant to autonomous driving, such as transitions into the night, rainy, or snowy domain. Overall, our approach shows great potential for application in deployment settings and enables operational design domain recognition via uncertainty, which allows for defensive perception, safe state triggers, warning notifications, and feedback for testing or development and adaptation of the perception stack.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  2. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  3. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  4. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  5. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  6. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
  7. 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
  8. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
  9. 2020Entropy Maximization and Meta Classification for Out-Of-Distribution Detection in Semantic Segmentationcited by 133
  10. 2018Prediction Error Meta Classification in Semantic Segmentation: Detection via Aggregated Dispersion Measures of Softmax Probabilitiescited by 54
  11. 2019Survey of Dropout Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
  12. 2019Uncertainty Measures and Prediction Quality Rating for the Semantic Segmentation of Nested Multi Resolution Street Scene Imagescited by 18
2 more
  1. 2015Universum Prescription: Regularization using Unlabeled Datacited by 16
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Appendixcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.