mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

High-Level Parallelism and Nested Features for Dynamic Inference Cost and Top-Down Attention

arXiv 2308.05128 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a novel network topology that seamlessly integrates dynamic inference cost with a top-down attention mechanism, addressing two significant gaps in traditional deep learning models. Drawing inspiration from human perception, we combine sequential processing of generic low-level features with parallelism and nesting of high-level features. This design not only reflects a finding from recent neuroscience research regarding - spatially and contextually distinct neural activations - in human cortex, but also introduces a novel "cutout" technique: the ability to selectively activate %segments of the network for task-relevant only network segments of task-relevant categories to optimize inference cost and eliminate the need for re-training. We believe this paves the way for future network designs that are lightweight and adaptable, making them suitable for a wide range of applications, from compact edge devices to large-scale clouds. Our proposed topology also comes with a built-in top-down attention mechanism, which allows processing to be directly influenced by either enhancing or inhibiting category-specific high-level features, drawing parallels to the selective attention mechanism observed in human cognition. Using targeted external signals, we experimentally enhanced predictions across all tested models. In terms of dynamic inference cost our methodology can achieve an exclusion of up to 73.48,% of parameters and 84.41,% fewer giga-multiply-accumulate (GMAC) operations, analysis against comparative baselines show an average reduction of 40,% in parameters and 8,% in GMACs across the cases we evaluated.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2023.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  8. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
  9. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  10. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
  11. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  12. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
9 more
  1. 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 408
  2. 2021Nested Hierarchical Transformer: Towards Accurate, Data-Efficient and Interpretable Visual Understandingcited by 97
  3. 2021Attention, please! A survey of Neural Attention Models in Deep Learningcited by 51
  4. 2022Enable Deep Learning on Mobile Devices: Methods, Systems, and Applicationscited by 32
  5. 2020An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognitioncited by 30
  6. 2020Fully Dynamic Inference with Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
  7. 2022Neural Networks are Decision Treescited by 17
  8. 2018Deep Learning Towards Mobile Applicationscited by 16
  9. 2021Denoised Internal Models: a Brain-Inspired Autoencoder against Adversarial Attackscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.