SLPT: Selective Labeling Meets Prompt Tuning on Label-Limited Lesion Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Medical image analysis using deep learning is often challenged by limited labeled data and high annotation costs. Fine-tuning the entire network in label-limited scenarios can lead to overfitting and suboptimal performance. Recently, prompt tuning has emerged as a more promising technique that introduces a few additional tunable parameters as prompts to a task-agnostic pre-trained model, and updates only these parameters using supervision from limited labeled data while keeping the pre-trained model unchanged. However, previous work has overlooked the importance of selective labeling in downstream tasks, which aims to select the most valuable downstream samples for annotation to achieve the best performance with minimum annotation cost. To address this, we propose a framework that combines selective labeling with prompt tuning (SLPT) to boost performance in limited labels. Specifically, we introduce a feature-aware prompt updater to guide prompt tuning and a TandEm Selective LAbeling (TESLA) strategy. TESLA includes unsupervised diversity selection and supervised selection using prompt-based uncertainty. In addition, we propose a diversified visual prompt tuning strategy to provide multi-prompt-based discrepant predictions for TESLA. We evaluate our method on liver tumor segmentation and achieve state-of-the-art performance, outperforming traditional fine-tuning with only 6% of tunable parameters, also achieving 94% of full-data performance by labeling only 5% of the data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2023.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
- 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
- 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
9 more
- 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
- 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 179
- 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 89
- 2020Sequential Graph Convolutional Network for Active Learningcited by 69
- 2022Active Learning by Feature Mixingcited by 63
- 2023A Simple Zero-shot Prompt Weighting Technique to Improve Prompt Ensembling in Text-Image Modelscited by 39
- 2022Prompt-Matched Semantic Segmentationcited by 22
- 2020Suggestive Annotation of Brain Tumour Images with Gradient-guided Samplingcited by 19
- 2021Boosting Active Learning via Improving Test Performancecited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.