mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A new approach for evaluating internal cluster validation indices

arXiv 2308.03894 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A vast number of different methods are available for unsupervised classification. Since no algorithm and parameter setting performs best in all types of data, there is a need for cluster validation to select the actually best-performing algorithm. Several indices were proposed for this purpose without using any additional (external) information. These internal validation indices can be evaluated by applying them to classifications of datasets with a known cluster structure. Evaluation approaches differ in how they use the information on the ground-truth classification. This paper reviews these approaches, considering their advantages and disadvantages, and then suggests a new approach.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2023.

Builds on

2 of 22 references.

References · 2

  1. 2022Are Cluster Validity Measures (In)valid?cited by 16
  2. 2020Comparing clusterings and numbers of clusters by aggregation of calibrated clustering validity indexescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.