mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Applied metamodelling for ATM performance simulations

arXiv 2308.03404 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of Air traffic management (ATM) simulators for planing and operations can be challenging due to their modelling complexity. This paper presents XALM (eXplainable Active Learning Metamodel), a three-step framework integrating active learning and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values into simulation metamodels for supporting ATM decision-making. XALM efficiently uncovers hidden relationships among input and output variables in ATM simulators, those usually of interest in policy analysis. Our experiments show XALM's predictive performance comparable to the XGBoost metamodel with fewer simulations. Additionally, XALM exhibits superior explanatory capabilities compared to non-active learning metamodels. Using the `Mercury' (flight and passenger) ATM simulator, XALM is applied to a real-world scenario in Paris Charles de Gaulle airport, extending an arrival manager's range and scope by analysing six variables. This case study illustrates XALM's effectiveness in enhancing simulation interpretability and understanding variable interactions. By addressing computational challenges and improving explainability, XALM complements traditional simulation-based analyses. Lastly, we discuss two practical approaches for reducing the computational burden of the metamodelling further: we introduce a stopping criterion for active learning based on the inherent uncertainty of the metamodel, and we show how the simulations used for the metamodel can be reused across key performance indicators, thus decreasing the overall number of simulations needed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.

Builds on

7 of 50 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  5. 2020Active Learning: Problem Settings and Recent Developmentscited by 23
  6. 2020Active Learning for Gaussian Process Considering Uncertainties with Application to Shape Control of Composite Fuselagecited by 14
  7. 2023Nonstationary Gaussian Process Surrogatescited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.