A Four-Pronged Defense Against Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
textitFederated learning (FL) is a nascent distributed learning paradigm to train a shared global model without violating users' privacy. FL has been shown to be vulnerable to various Byzantine attacks, where malicious participants could independently or collusively upload well-crafted updates to deteriorate the performance of the global model. However, existing defenses could only mitigate part of Byzantine attacks, without providing an all-sided shield for FL. It is difficult to simply combine them as they rely on totally contradictory assumptions. In this paper, we propose FPD, a underlinefour-underlinepronged underlinedefense against both non-colluding and colluding Byzantine attacks. Our main idea is to utilize absolute similarity to filter updates rather than relative similarity used in existingI works. To this end, we first propose a reliable client selection strategy to prevent the majority of threats in the bud. Then we design a simple but effective score-based detection method to mitigate colluding attacks. Third, we construct an enhanced spectral-based outlier detector to accurately discard abnormal updates when the training data is textitnot independent and identically distributed (non-IID). Finally, we design update denoising to rectify the direction of the slightly noisy but harmful updates. The four sequentially combined modules can effectively reconcile the contradiction in addressing non-colluding and colluding Byzantine attacks. Extensive experiments over three benchmark image classification datasets against four state-of-the-art Byzantine attacks demonstrate that FPD drastically outperforms existing defenses in IID and non-IID scenarios (with 30% improvement on model accuracy).
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023ZooPFL: Exploring Black-box Foundation Models for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2025MARS: A Malignity-Aware Backdoor Defense in Federated Learningcited by 7
- 2023AGRAMPLIFIER: Defending Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks Through Local Update Amplificationcited by 5
- 2023MISA: Unveiling the Vulnerabilities in Split Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2023Can We Trust the Similarity Measurement in Federated Learning?cited by 1
- 2024PFAttack: Stealthy Attack Bypassing Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025FedBAP: Backdoor Defense via Benign Adversarial Perturbation in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026FedIDM: Achieving Fast and Stable Convergence in Byzantine Federated Learning through Iterative Distribution Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunitiescited by 0
- 2026Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunities23 Sep 2026
- 2026FedIDM: Achieving Fast and Stable Convergence in Byzantine Federated Learning through Iterative Distribution Matching16 Apr 2026
- 2025MARS: A Malignity-Aware Backdoor Defense in Federated Learning21 Sep 2025
- 2025FedBAP: Backdoor Defense via Benign Adversarial Perturbation in Federated Learning26 Jul 2025
- 2024PFAttack: Stealthy Attack Bypassing Group Fairness in Federated Learning9 Oct 2024
- 2023MISA: Unveiling the Vulnerabilities in Split Federated Learning18 Dec 2023
- 2023AGRAMPLIFIER: Defending Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks Through Local Update Amplification13 Nov 2023
- 2023Can We Trust the Similarity Measurement in Federated Learning?20 Oct 2023
- 2023ZooPFL: Exploring Black-box Foundation Models for Personalized Federated Learning8 Oct 2023