mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transactional Indexes on (RDMA or CXL-based) Disaggregated Memory with Repairable Transaction

arXiv 2308.02501 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2023cs.DBcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The failure atomic and isolated execution of clients operations is a default requirement for a system that serve multiple loosely coupled clients at a server. However, disaggregated memory breaks this requirement in remote indexes because a client operation is disaggregated to multiple remote reads/writes. Current indexes focus on performance improvements and largely ignore tolerating client failures. We argue that a practical DM index should be transactional: each index operation should be failure atomic and isolated in addition to being concurrency isolated. We present repairable transaction (rTX), a lightweight primitive to execute DM index operations. Each rTX can detect other failed rTXes on-the-fly with the help of concurrency control. Upon detection, it will repair their non-atomic updates online with the help of logging, thus hiding their failures from healthy clients. By further removing unnecessary logging and delegating concurrency control to existing carefully-tuned index algorithms, we show that transactional indexes can be built at a low performance overhead on disaggregated memory. We have refactored two state-of-the-art DM indexes, RaceHashing and Sherman (B+Tree), with rTX. Evaluations show that rTX is 1.2 to 2X faster than other alternatives, e.g., distributed transaction. Meanwhile, its overhead is up to 42% compared to non-fault-tolerant indexes.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.