mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sustainable transparency in Recommender Systems: Bayesian Ranking of Images for Explainability

arXiv 2308.01196 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2023cs.IR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender Systems have become crucial in the modern world, commonly guiding users towards relevant content or products, and having a large influence over the decisions of users and citizens. However, ensuring transparency and user trust in these systems remains a challenge; personalized explanations have emerged as a solution, offering justifications for recommendations. Among the existing approaches for generating personalized explanations, using existing visual content created by users is a promising option to maximize transparency and user trust. State-of-the-art models that follow this approach, despite leveraging highly optimized architectures, employ surrogate learning tasks that do not efficiently model the objective of ranking images as explanations for a given recommendation; this leads to a suboptimal training process with high computational costs that may not be reduced without affecting model performance. This work presents BRIE, a novel model where we leverage Bayesian Pairwise Ranking to enhance the training process, allowing us to consistently outperform state-of-the-art models in six real-world datasets while reducing its model size by up to 64 times and its CO2 emissions by up to 75% in training and inference.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.

Builds on

13 of 35 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  4. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  5. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  6. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  7. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  8. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  9. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  10. 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
  11. 2020Exploring Data Splitting Strategies for the Evaluation of Recommendation Modelscited by 48
  12. 2021On the Relationship between Explanation and Recommendation: Learning to Rank Explanations for Improved Performancecited by 4
1 more
  1. 2023Justification vs. Transparency: Why and How Visual Explanations in a Scientific Literature Recommender Systemcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.