mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semisupervised Anomaly Detection using Support Vector Regression with Quantum Kernel

arXiv 2308.00583 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023quant-ph cs.CR cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly detection (AD) involves identifying observations or events that deviate in some way from the rest of the data. Machine learning techniques have shown success in automating this process by detecting hidden patterns and deviations in large-scale data. The potential of quantum computing for machine learning has been widely recognized, leading to extensive research efforts to develop suitable quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms. In particular, the search for QML algorithms for near-term NISQ devices is in full swing. However, NISQ devices pose additional challenges due to their limited qubit coherence times, low number of qubits, and high error rates. Kernel methods based on quantum kernel estimation have emerged as a promising approach to QML on NISQ devices, offering theoretical guarantees, versatility, and compatibility with NISQ constraints. Especially support vector machines (SVM) utilizing quantum kernel estimation have shown success in various supervised learning tasks. However, in the context of AD, semisupervised learning is of great relevance, and yet there is limited research published in this area. This paper introduces an approach to semisupervised AD based on the reconstruction loss of a support vector regression (SVR) with quantum kernel. This novel model is an alternative to the variational quantum and quantum kernel one-class classifiers, and is compared to a quantum autoencoder as quantum baseline and a SVR with radial-basis-function (RBF) kernel as well as a classical autoencoder as classical baselines. The models are benchmarked extensively on 10 real-world AD data sets and one toy data set, and it is shown that our SVR model with quantum kernel performs better than the SVR with RBF kernel as well as all other models, achieving highest mean AUC over all data sets. In addition, our QSVR outperforms the quantum autoencoder on 9 out of 11 data sets.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 53 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  3. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  4. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  5. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
  6. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  7. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  8. 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
  9. 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
  10. 2023Quantum anomaly detection in the latent space of proton collision events at the LHCcited by 21
  11. 2021Enhancing Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Score-Guided Networkcited by 8
  12. 2021Double-Adversarial Activation Anomaly Detection: Adversarial Autoencoders are Anomaly Generatorscited by 3
2 more
  1. 2021Quantum Machine Learning with HQC Architectures using non-Classically Simulable Feature Mapscited by 2
  2. 2022R2-AD2: Detecting Anomalies by Analysing the Raw Gradientcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

6 papers.