mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Analysis of Drug-GPT and ChatGPT LLMs for Healthcare Insights: Evaluating Accuracy and Relevance in Patient and HCP Contexts

arXiv 2307.16850 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents a comparative analysis of three Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) solutions in a question and answer (Q&A) setting: Drug-GPT 3, Drug-GPT 4, and ChatGPT, in the context of healthcare applications. The objective is to determine which model delivers the most accurate and relevant information in response to prompts related to patient experiences with atopic dermatitis (AD) and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions about diabetes. The results demonstrate that while all three models are capable of generating relevant and accurate responses, Drug-GPT 3 and Drug-GPT 4, which are supported by curated datasets of patient and HCP social media and message board posts, provide more targeted and in-depth insights. ChatGPT, a more general-purpose model, generates broader and more general responses, which may be valuable for readers seeking a high-level understanding of the topics but may lack the depth and personal insights found in the answers generated by the specialized Drug-GPT models. This comparative analysis highlights the importance of considering the language model's perspective, depth of knowledge, and currency when evaluating the usefulness of generated information in healthcare applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.

Builds on

2 of 32 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023ClinicalGPT: Large Language Models Finetuned with Diverse Medical Data and Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 88

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.