User-Controlled Knowledge Fusion in Large Language Models: Balancing Creativity and Hallucination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In modern dialogue systems, the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has grown exponentially due to their capacity to generate diverse, relevant, and creative responses. Despite their strengths, striking a balance between the LLMs' creativity and their faithfulness to external knowledge remains a key challenge. This paper presents an innovative user-controllable mechanism that modulates the balance between an LLM's imaginative capabilities and its adherence to factual information. Our approach incorporates a numerical tag during the fine-tuning phase of the LLM's training, representing the degree of faithfulness to the reference knowledge in the generated responses. This degree is computed through an automated process that measures lexical overlap using ROUGE scores, semantic similarity using Sentence-BERT embeddings, and an LLM's self-evaluation score. During model inference, users can manipulate this numerical tag, thus controlling the degree of the LLM's reliance on external knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments across various scenarios, demonstrating the adaptability of our method and its efficacy in ensuring the quality and accuracy of the LLM's responses. The results highlight the potential of our approach to enhance the versatility of LLMs while maintaining a balance between creativity and hallucination.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 1 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2023.
Builds on
0 of 1 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model Hallucinationscited by 43
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspectivecited by 38
- 2025Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Datacited by 25
- 2025KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factualitycited by 20
- 2024LightHouse: A Survey of AGI Hallucinationcited by 4
- 2025From Queries to Criteria: Understanding How Astronomers Evaluate LLMscited by 2
- 2025Towards Mitigation of Hallucination for LLM-empowered Agents: Progressive Generalization Bound Exploration and Watchdog Monitorcited by 1
- 2025Towards Mitigation of Hallucination for LLM-empowered Agents: Progressive Generalization Bound Exploration and Watchdog Monitor21 Jul 2025
- 2025From Queries to Criteria: Understanding How Astronomers Evaluate LLMs21 Jul 2025
- 2025KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factuality24 Jun 2025
- 2025Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Data17 Apr 2025
- 2024Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model Hallucinations6 Jun 2024
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspective2 Feb 2024
- 2024LightHouse: A Survey of AGI Hallucination8 Jan 2024