Fact-Checking of AI-Generated Reports
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is now possible to produce realistic-looking automated reports for preliminary reads of radiology images. This can expedite clinical workflows, improve accuracy and reduce overall costs. However, it is also well-known that such models often hallucinate, leading to false findings in the generated reports. In this paper, we propose a new method of fact-checking of AI-generated reports using their associated images. Specifically, the developed examiner differentiates real and fake sentences in reports by learning the association between an image and sentences describing real or potentially fake findings. To train such an examiner, we first created a new dataset of fake reports by perturbing the findings in the original ground truth radiology reports associated with images. Text encodings of real and fake sentences drawn from these reports are then paired with image encodings to learn the mapping to real/fake labels. The utility of such an examiner is demonstrated for verifying automatically generated reports by detecting and removing fake sentences. Future generative AI approaches can use the resulting tool to validate their reports leading to a more responsible use of AI in expediting clinical workflows.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.
Builds on
15 of 28 references.
References · 15
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
- 2018Hybrid Retrieval-Generation Reinforced Agent for Medical Image Report Generationcited by 141
- 2019Clinically Accurate Chest X-Ray Report Generationcited by 138
- 2016A Hierarchical Approach for Generating Descriptive Image Paragraphscited by 104
- 2019Knowledge-driven Encode, Retrieve, Paraphrase for Medical Image Report Generationcited by 101
- 2017Long Text Generation via Adversarial Training with Leaked Informationcited by 100
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifyingcited by 34
- 2024ERBench: An Entity-Relationship based Automatically Verifiable Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2023Insights into Classifying and Mitigating LLMs' Hallucinationscited by 6
- 2025From Knowledge Generation to Knowledge Verification: Examining the BioMedical Generative Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 4
- 2025Phrase-grounded Fact-checking for Automatically Generated Chest X-ray Reportscited by 2
- 2025Phrase-grounded Fact-checking for Automatically Generated Chest X-ray Reports20 Sep 2025
- 2025From Knowledge Generation to Knowledge Verification: Examining the BioMedical Generative Capabilities of ChatGPT20 Feb 2025
- 2024ERBench: An Entity-Relationship based Automatically Verifiable Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language Models8 Mar 2024
- 2024AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying9 Jan 2024
- 2023Insights into Classifying and Mitigating LLMs' Hallucinations14 Nov 2023
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Models13 Sep 2023