mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Multi-Task Learning Meets Partial Supervision: A Computer Vision Review

arXiv 2307.14382 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Task Learning (MTL) aims to learn multiple tasks simultaneously while exploiting their mutual relationships. By using shared resources to simultaneously calculate multiple outputs, this learning paradigm has the potential to have lower memory requirements and inference times compared to the traditional approach of using separate methods for each task. Previous work in MTL has mainly focused on fully-supervised methods, as task relationships can not only be leveraged to lower the level of data-dependency of those methods but they can also improve performance. However, MTL introduces a set of challenges due to a complex optimisation scheme and a higher labeling requirement. This review focuses on how MTL could be utilised under different partial supervision settings to address these challenges. First, this review analyses how MTL traditionally uses different parameter sharing techniques to transfer knowledge in between tasks. Second, it presents the different challenges arising from such a multi-objective optimisation scheme. Third, it introduces how task groupings can be achieved by analysing task relationships. Fourth, it focuses on how partially supervised methods applied to MTL can tackle the aforementioned challenges. Lastly, this review presents the available datasets, tools and benchmarking results of such methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 153 of its 233 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2023.

Builds on

153 of 233 references.

References · 153

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  8. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  11. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  12. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
38 more
  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  2. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  3. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  6. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  9. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
  10. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  11. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
  12. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  13. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  14. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  15. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
  16. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,803
  17. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  18. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,428
  19. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  20. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  21. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,114
  22. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,066
  23. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  24. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  25. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  26. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  27. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 803
  28. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 788
  29. 2021PVT v2: Improved Baselines with Pyramid Vision Transformercited by 751
  30. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 634
  31. 2013Network In Networkcited by 605
  32. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
  33. 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 534
  34. 2022InternImage: Exploring Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models with Deformable Convolutionscited by 482
  35. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 467
  36. 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 459
  37. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 440
  38. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 375

50 most cited of 153 All 153 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

6 papers.