mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid Representation-Enhanced Sampling for Bayesian Active Learning in Musculoskeletal Segmentation of Lower Extremities

arXiv 2307.13986 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Manual annotations for training deep learning (DL) models in auto-segmentation are time-intensive. This study introduces a hybrid representation-enhanced sampling strategy that integrates both density and diversity criteria within an uncertainty-based Bayesian active learning (BAL) framework to reduce annotation efforts by selecting the most informative training samples. Methods: The experiments are performed on two lower extremity (LE) datasets of MRI and CT images, focusing on the segmentation of the femur, pelvis, sacrum, quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, adductors, sartorius, and iliopsoas, utilizing a U-net-based BAL framework. Our method selects uncertain samples with high density and diversity for manual revision, optimizing for maximal similarity to unlabeled instances and minimal similarity to existing training data. We assess the accuracy and efficiency using Dice and a proposed metric called reduced annotation cost (RAC), respectively. We further evaluate the impact of various acquisition rules on BAL performance and design an ablation study for effectiveness estimation. Results: In MRI and CT datasets, our method was superior or comparable to existing ones, achieving a 0.8% Dice and 1.0% RAC increase in CT (statistically significant), and a 0.8% Dice and 1.1% RAC increase in MRI (not statistically significant) in volume-wise acquisition. Our ablation study indicates that combining density and diversity criteria enhances the efficiency of BAL in musculoskeletal segmentation compared to using either criterion alone. Conclusion: Our sampling method is proven efficient in reducing annotation costs in image segmentation tasks. The combination of the proposed method and our BAL framework provides a semi-automatic way for efficient annotation of medical image datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
  4. 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 151
  5. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 146
  6. 2021Diminishing Uncertainty within the Training Pool: Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
  7. 2019Automated Muscle Segmentation from Clinical CT using Bayesian U-Net for Personalized Musculoskeletal Modelingcited by 22
  8. 2022Warm Start Active Learning with Proxy Labels & Selection via Semi-Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 21
  9. 2023Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batchescited by 21
  10. 2018MedAL: Deep Active Learning Sampling Method for Medical Image Analysiscited by 20
  11. 2019Active Learning for Segmentation Based on Bayesian Sample Queriescited by 12
  12. 2022Survey: Exploiting Data Redundancy for Optimization of Deep Learningcited by 6
1 more
  1. 2021A Survey on Active Deep Learning: From Model-driven to Data-drivencited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.