mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep neural network improves the estimation of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer

arXiv 2307.13010 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2023q-bio.QM cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) estimate the genetic risk of an individual for a complex disease based on many genetic variants across the whole genome. In this study, we compared a series of computational models for estimation of breast cancer PRS. A deep neural network (DNN) was found to outperform alternative machine learning techniques and established statistical algorithms, including BLUP, BayesA and LDpred. In the test cohort with 50% prevalence, the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) were 67.4% for DNN, 64.2% for BLUP, 64.5% for BayesA, and 62.4% for LDpred. BLUP, BayesA, and LPpred all generated PRS that followed a normal distribution in the case population. However, the PRS generated by DNN in the case population followed a bi-modal distribution composed of two normal distributions with distinctly different means. This suggests that DNN was able to separate the case population into a high-genetic-risk case sub-population with an average PRS significantly higher than the control population and a normal-genetic-risk case sub-population with an average PRS similar to the control population. This allowed DNN to achieve 18.8% recall at 90% precision in the test cohort with 50% prevalence, which can be extrapolated to 65.4% recall at 20% precision in a general population with 12% prevalence. Interpretation of the DNN model identified salient variants that were assigned insignificant p-values by association studies, but were important for DNN prediction. These variants may be associated with the phenotype through non-linear relationships.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.

Builds on

7 of 57 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  5. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
  6. 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 519
  7. 2018Utilising Deep Learning and Genome Wide Association Studies for Epistatic-Driven Preterm Birth Classification in African-American Womencited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.