Nonbossy Mechanisms: Mechanism Design Robust to Secondary Goals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study mechanism design when agents may have hidden secondary goals which will play a role when the primary utility of the outcomes is the same. We show that in such cases, a mechanism is immune to strategic manipulation if and only if it is incentive compatible with regard to primary utility -- a property we term "primary incentive compatibility" -- and nonbossy -- a well-studied property in the context of matching and allocation mechanisms. We give complete characterizations of primarily incentive-compatible and nonbossy mechanisms in various settings, including auctions with single-parameter agents and public decision settings where all agents share a common outcome. In particular, we show that in the single-item setting, a mechanism is primarily incentive compatible, individually rational, and nonbossy if and only if it is a sequential posted-price mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.