mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Implicit Interpretation of Importance Weight Aware Updates

arXiv 2307.11955 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to its speed and simplicity, subgradient descent is one of the most used optimization algorithms in convex machine learning algorithms. However, tuning its learning rate is probably its most severe bottleneck to achieve consistent good performance. A common way to reduce the dependency on the learning rate is to use implicit/proximal updates. One such variant is the Importance Weight Aware (IWA) updates, which consist of infinitely many infinitesimal updates on each loss function. However, IWA updates' empirical success is not completely explained by their theory. In this paper, we show for the first time that IWA updates have a strictly better regret upper bound than plain gradient updates in the online learning setting. Our analysis is based on the new framework, generalized implicit Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) (Chen and Orabona, 2023), to analyze generalized implicit updates using a dual formulation. In particular, our results imply that IWA updates can be considered as approximate implicit/proximal updates.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2023.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  2. 2018Stochastic (Approximate) Proximal Point Methods: Convergence, Optimality, and Adaptivitycited by 61
  3. 2020Temporal Variability in Implicit Online Learningcited by 20
  4. 2023Generalized Implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leadercited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.