Beyond the ML Model: Applying Safety Engineering Frameworks to Text-to-Image Development
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying potential social and ethical risks in emerging machine learning (ML) models and their applications remains challenging. In this work, we applied two well-established safety engineering frameworks (FMEA, STPA) to a case study involving text-to-image models at three stages of the ML product development pipeline: data processing, integration of a T2I model with other models, and use. Results of our analysis demonstrate the safety frameworks - both of which are not designed explicitly examine social and ethical risks - can uncover failure and hazards that pose social and ethical risks. We discovered a broad range of failures and hazards (i.e., functional, social, and ethical) by analyzing interactions (i.e., between different ML models in the product, between the ML product and user, and between development teams) and processes (i.e., preparation of training data or workflows for using an ML service/product). Our findings underscore the value and importance of examining beyond an ML model in examining social and ethical risks, especially when we have minimal information about an ML model.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 14
- 2025Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 11
- 2024AI Alignment through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback? Contradictions and Limitationscited by 10
- 2024Beyond the Safety Bundle: Auditing the Helpful and Harmless Datasetcited by 8
- 2025From Hazard Identification to Controller Design: Proactive and LLM-Supported Safety Engineering for ML-Powered Systemscited by 7
- 2024BSPA: Exploring Black-box Stealthy Prompt Attacks against Image Generatorscited by 6
- 2025Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harmscited by 5
- 2025What Is AI Safety? What Do We Want It to Be?cited by 2
- 2026Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AIcited by 0
- 2026Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AI15 Jul 2026
- 2025Measuring What Matters: Connecting AI Ethics Evaluations to System Attributes, Hazards, and Harms11 Oct 2025
- 2025Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models15 Jul 2025
- 2025What Is AI Safety? What Do We Want It to Be?5 May 2025
- 2025From Hazard Identification to Controller Design: Proactive and LLM-Supported Safety Engineering for ML-Powered Systems11 Feb 2025
- 2024Beyond the Safety Bundle: Auditing the Helpful and Harmless Dataset12 Nov 2024
- 2024AI Alignment through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback? Contradictions and Limitations26 Jun 2024
- 2024BSPA: Exploring Black-box Stealthy Prompt Attacks against Image Generators23 Feb 2024
- 2024Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Models1 Feb 2024