Test-takers have a say: understanding the implications of the use of AI in language tests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language tests measure a person's ability to use a language in terms of listening, speaking, reading, or writing. Such tests play an integral role in academic, professional, and immigration domains, with entities such as educational institutions, professional accreditation bodies, and governments using them to assess candidate language proficiency. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the discipline of Natural Language Processing have prompted language test providers to explore AI's potential applicability within language testing, leading to transformative activity patterns surrounding language instruction and learning. However, with concerns over AI's trustworthiness, it is imperative to understand the implications of integrating AI into language testing. This knowledge will enable stakeholders to make well-informed decisions, thus safeguarding community well-being and testing integrity. To understand the concerns and effects of AI usage in language tests, we conducted interviews and surveys with English test-takers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first empirical study aimed at identifying the implications of AI adoption in language tests from a test-taker perspective. Our study reveals test-taker perceptions and behavioral patterns. Specifically, we identify that AI integration may enhance perceptions of fairness, consistency, and availability. Conversely, it might incite mistrust regarding reliability and interactivity aspects, subsequently influencing the behaviors and well-being of test-takers. These insights provide a better understanding of potential societal implications and assist stakeholders in making informed decisions concerning AI usage in language testing.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.
Builds on
6 of 62 references.
References · 6
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2022Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systemscited by 15
- 2019In AI We Trust? Factors That Influence Trustworthiness of AI-infused Decision-Making Processescited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.