mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a population-informed approach to the definition of data-driven models for structural dynamics

arXiv 2307.09862 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AI eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has affected the way in which many phenomena for various domains are modelled, one of these domains being that of structural dynamics. However, because machine-learning algorithms are problem-specific, they often fail to perform efficiently in cases of data scarcity. To deal with such issues, combination of physics-based approaches and machine learning algorithms have been developed. Although such methods are effective, they also require the analyser's understanding of the underlying physics of the problem. The current work is aimed at motivating the use of models which learn such relationships from a population of phenomena, whose underlying physics are similar. The development of such models is motivated by the way that physics-based models, and more specifically finite element models, work. Such models are considered transferrable, explainable and trustworthy, attributes which are not trivially imposed or achieved for machine-learning models. For this reason, machine-learning approaches are less trusted by industry and often considered more difficult to form validated models. To achieve such data-driven models, a population-based scheme is followed here and two different machine-learning algorithms from the meta-learning domain are used. The two algorithms are the model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) algorithm and the conditional neural processes (CNP) model. The algorithms seem to perform as intended and outperform a traditional machine-learning algorithm at approximating the quantities of interest. Moreover, they exhibit behaviour similar to traditional machine learning algorithms (e.g. neural networks or Gaussian processes), concerning their performance as a function of the available structures in the training population.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  4. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  5. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
  6. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
  7. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  8. 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 421
  9. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
  10. 2021The Modern Mathematics of Deep Learningcited by 63
  11. 2021Foundations of Population-Based SHM, Part IV: The Geometry of Spaces of Structures and their Feature Spacescited by 15
  12. 2021Grey-box models for wave loading predictioncited by 13
2 more
  1. 2020Information Theoretic Meta Learning with Gaussian Processescited by 11
  2. 2022Physics-informed machine learning for Structural Health Monitoringcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.