Characterization of partial wetting by CMAS droplets using multiphase many-body dissipative particle dynamics and data-driven discovery based on PINNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The molten sand, a mixture of calcia, magnesia, alumina, and silicate, known as CMAS, is characterized by its high viscosity, density, and surface tension. The unique properties of CMAS make it a challenging material to deal with in high-temperature applications, requiring innovative solutions and materials to prevent its buildup and damage to critical equipment. Here, we use multiphase many-body dissipative particle dynamics (mDPD) simulations to study the wetting dynamics of highly viscous molten CMAS droplets. The simulations are performed in three dimensions, with varying initial droplet sizes and equilibrium contact angles. We propose a coarse parametric ordinary differential equation (ODE) that captures the spreading radius behavior of the CMAS droplets. The ODE parameters are then identified based on the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework. Subsequently, the closed form dependency of parameter values found by PINN on the initial radii and contact angles are given using symbolic regression. Finally, we employ Bayesian PINNs (B-PINNs) to assess and quantify the uncertainty associated with the discovered parameters. In brief, this study provides insight into spreading dynamics of CMAS droplets by fusing simple parametric ODE modeling and state-of-the-art machine learning techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.
Builds on
13 of 82 references.
References · 13
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 115
- 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
- 2020Physics-informed neural network for ultrasound nondestructive quantification of surface breaking crackscited by 67
- 2019Coarse-scale PDEs from fine-scale observations via machine learningcited by 35
- 2021Explaining Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2023A Framework Based on Symbolic Regression Coupled with eXtended Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Gray-Box Learning of Equations of Motion from Datacited by 18
- 2021A toolkit for data-driven discovery of governing equations in high-noise regimescited by 15
- 2020Data-driven Identification of 2D Partial Differential Equations using extracted physical featurescited by 8
- 2017Modified Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Bayesian inferencecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Optimizing the Optimizer for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 41
- 2024Predicting Crack Nucleation and Propagation in Brittle Materials Using Deep Operator Networks with Diverse Trunk Architecturescited by 12
- 2025GIMLET: Generalizable and Interpretable Model Learning through Embedded Thermodynamicscited by 0
- 2026Atoms to Processes: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chemical Engineeringcited by 0
- 2026Atoms to Processes: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chemical Engineering1 Oct 2026
- 2025GIMLET: Generalizable and Interpretable Model Learning through Embedded Thermodynamics22 Dec 2025
- 2025Optimizing the Optimizer for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks22 Jan 2025
- 2024Predicting Crack Nucleation and Propagation in Brittle Materials Using Deep Operator Networks with Diverse Trunk Architectures15 Dec 2024