mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting the Robustness of the Minimum Error Entropy Criterion: A Transfer Learning Case Study

arXiv 2307.08572 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coping with distributional shifts is an important part of transfer learning methods in order to perform well in real-life tasks. However, most of the existing approaches in this area either focus on an ideal scenario in which the data does not contain noises or employ a complicated training paradigm or model design to deal with distributional shifts. In this paper, we revisit the robustness of the minimum error entropy (MEE) criterion, a widely used objective in statistical signal processing to deal with non-Gaussian noises, and investigate its feasibility and usefulness in real-life transfer learning regression tasks, where distributional shifts are common. Specifically, we put forward a new theoretical result showing the robustness of MEE against covariate shift. We also show that by simply replacing the mean squared error (MSE) loss with the MEE on basic transfer learning algorithms such as fine-tuning and linear probing, we can achieve competitive performance with respect to state-of-the-art transfer learning algorithms. We justify our arguments on both synthetic data and 5 real-world time-series data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2023.

Builds on

18 of 50 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  4. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  5. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  6. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  7. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
  8. 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
  9. 2021Monash Time Series Forecasting Archivecited by 267
  10. 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
  11. 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
  12. 2022Pushing the Limits of Simple Pipelines for Few-Shot Learning: External Data and Fine-Tuning Make a Differencecited by 126
6 more
  1. 2018Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causalitycited by 118
  2. 2019Robust Learning with the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterioncited by 36
  3. 2018Understanding Autoencoders with Information Theoretic Conceptscited by 29
  4. 2020Adversarial Weighting for Domain Adaptation in Regressioncited by 19
  5. 2021Measuring Dependence with Matrix-based Entropy Functionalcited by 19
  6. 2021ADAPT : Awesome Domain Adaptation Python Toolboxcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.