mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Learning for Ranking f-wave Extraction Methods in Single-Lead ECGs

arXiv 2307.08331 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2023eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: The presence of fibrillatory waves (f-waves) is important in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), which has motivated the development of methods for f-wave extraction. We propose a novel approach to benchmarking methods designed for single-lead ECG analysis, building on the hypothesis that better-performing AF classification using features computed from the extracted f-waves implies better-performing extraction. The approach is well-suited for processing large Holter data sets annotated with respect to the presence of AF. Methods: Three data sets with a total of 300 two- or three-lead Holter recordings, performed in the USA, Israel and Japan, were used as well as a simulated single-lead data set. Four existing extraction methods based on either average beat subtraction or principal component analysis (PCA) were evaluated. A random forest classifier was used for window-based AF classification. Performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Results: The best performance was found for PCA-based extraction, resulting in AUROCs in the ranges 0.77--0.83, 0.62--0.78, and 0.87--0.89 for the data sets from USA, Israel, and Japan, respectively, when analyzed across leads; the AUROC of the simulated single-lead, noisy data set was 0.98. Conclusions: This study provides a novel approach to evaluating the performance of f-wave extraction methods, offering the advantage of not using ground truth f-waves for evaluation, thus being able to leverage real data sets for evaluation. The code is open source (following publication).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.