From Information to Choice: A Critical Inquiry Into Visualization Tools for Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the face of complex decisions, people often engage in a three-stage process that spans from (1) exploring and analyzing pertinent information (intelligence); (2) generating and exploring alternative options (design); and ultimately culminating in (3) selecting the optimal decision by evaluating discerning criteria (choice). We can fairly assume that all good visualizations aid in the intelligence stage by enabling data exploration and analysis. Yet, to what degree and how do visualization systems currently support the other decision making stages, namely design and choice? To explore this question, we conducted a comprehensive review of decision-focused visualization tools by examining publications in major visualization journals and conferences, including VIS, EuroVis, and CHI, spanning all available years. We employed a deductive coding method and in-depth analysis to assess if and how visualization tools support design and choice. Specifically, we examined each visualization tool by (i) its degree of visibility for displaying decision alternatives, criteria, and preferences, and (ii) its degree of flexibility for offering means to manipulate the decision alternatives, criteria, and preferences with interactions such as adding, modifying, changing mapping, and filtering. Our review highlights the opportunities and challenges and reveals a surprising scarcity of tools that support all stages, and while most tools excel in offering visibility for decision criteria and alternatives, the degree of flexibility to manipulate these elements is often limited, and the lack of tools that accommodate decision preferences and their elicitation is notable. Future research could explore enhancing flexibility levels and variety, exploring novel visualization paradigms, increasing algorithmic support, and ensuring that this automation is user-controlled via the enhanced flexibility levels.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agentscited by 5
- 2025RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 4
- 2024Aiding Humans in Financial Fraud Decision Making: Toward an XAI-Visualization Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Now You See Me: Designing Responsible AI Dashboards for Early-Stage Health Innovationcited by 0
- 2026Now You See Me: Designing Responsible AI Dashboards for Early-Stage Health Innovation27 Jan 2026
- 2025RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented Generation8 Aug 2025
- 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agents21 Apr 2025
- 2024Aiding Humans in Financial Fraud Decision Making: Toward an XAI-Visualization Framework26 Aug 2024