mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Flexible Time-to-event Modeling: Optimizing Neural Networks via Rank Regression

arXiv 2307.08044 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-to-event analysis, also known as survival analysis, aims to predict the time of occurrence of an event, given a set of features. One of the major challenges in this area is dealing with censored data, which can make learning algorithms more complex. Traditional methods such as Cox's proportional hazards model and the accelerated failure time (AFT) model have been popular in this field, but they often require assumptions such as proportional hazards and linearity. In particular, the AFT models often require pre-specified parametric distributional assumptions. To improve predictive performance and alleviate strict assumptions, there have been many deep learning approaches for hazard-based models in recent years. However, representation learning for AFT has not been widely explored in the neural network literature, despite its simplicity and interpretability in comparison to hazard-focused methods. In this work, we introduce the Deep AFT Rank-regression model for Time-to-event prediction (DART). This model uses an objective function based on Gehan's rank statistic, which is efficient and reliable for representation learning. On top of eliminating the requirement to establish a baseline event time distribution, DART retains the advantages of directly predicting event time in standard AFT models. The proposed method is a semiparametric approach to AFT modeling that does not impose any distributional assumptions on the survival time distribution. This also eliminates the need for additional hyperparameters or complex model architectures, unlike existing neural network-based AFT models. Through quantitative analysis on various benchmark datasets, we have shown that DART has significant potential for modeling high-throughput censored time-to-event data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2023.

Builds on

11 of 47 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  2. 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 354
  3. 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 199
  4. 2018Universality of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  5. 2019Time-to-Event Prediction with Neural Networks and Cox Regressioncited by 173
  6. 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 85
  7. 2019Continuous and Discrete-Time Survival Prediction with Neural Networkscited by 68
  8. 2018Deep Recurrent Survival Analysiscited by 61
  9. 2021Deep Cox Mixtures for Survival Regressioncited by 43
  10. 2018Adversarial Time-to-Event Modelingcited by 33
  11. 2018Countdown Regression: Sharp and Calibrated Survival Predictionscited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.