mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Subjective Time-Series Data via Utopia Label Distribution Approximation

arXiv 2307.07682 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Subjective time-series regression (STR) tasks have gained increasing attention recently. However, most existing methods overlook the label distribution bias in STR data, which results in biased models. Emerging studies on imbalanced regression tasks, such as age estimation and depth estimation, hypothesize that the prior label distribution of the dataset is uniform. However, we observe that the label distributions of training and test sets in STR tasks are likely to be neither uniform nor identical. This distinct feature calls for new approaches that estimate more reasonable distributions to train a fair model. In this work, we propose Utopia Label Distribution Approximation (ULDA) for time-series data, which makes the training label distribution closer to real-world but unknown (utopia) label distribution. This would enhance the model's fairness. Specifically, ULDA first convolves the training label distribution by a Gaussian kernel. After convolution, the required sample quantity at each regression label may change. We further devise the Time-slice Normal Sampling (TNS) to generate new samples when the required sample quantity is greater than the initial sample quantity, and the Convolutional Weighted Loss (CWL) to lower the sample weight when the required sample quantity is less than the initial quantity. These two modules not only assist the model training on the approximated utopia label distribution, but also maintain the sample continuity in temporal context space. To the best of our knowledge, ULDA is the first method to address the label distribution bias in time-series data. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ULDA lifts the state-of-the-art performance on two STR tasks and three benchmark datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.

Builds on

20 of 62 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  4. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  5. 2018OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fieldscited by 1,161
  6. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  7. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
  8. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
  9. 2016CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classificationcited by 701
  10. 2020Rethinking the Value of Labels for Improving Class-Imbalanced Learningcited by 216
  11. 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
  12. 2022Balanced MSE for Imbalanced Visual Regressioncited by 89
8 more
  1. 2017Video Summarization with Attention-Based Encoder-Decoder Networkscited by 63
  2. 2022RankSim: Ranking Similarity Regularization for Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 52
  3. 2020Exploring global diverse attention via pairwise temporal relation for video summarizationcited by 29
  4. 2021Supervised Video Summarization via Multiple Feature Sets with Parallel Attentioncited by 26
  5. 2022Audio-Visual Fusion for Emotion Recognition in the Valence-Arousal Space Using Joint Cross-Attentioncited by 18
  6. 2021Affect2MM: Affective Analysis of Multimedia Content Using Emotion Causalitycited by 17
  7. 2023TAA-GCN: A Temporally Aware Adaptive Graph Convolutional Network for Age Estimationcited by 7
  8. 2019GLA in MediaEval 2018 Emotional Impact of Movies Taskcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.