mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Solving higher-order Lane-Emden-Fowler type equations using physics-informed neural networks: benchmark tests comparing soft and hard constraints

arXiv 2307.07302 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2023physics.comp-ph astro-ph.SR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, numerical methods using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are presented with the aim to solve higher-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Indeed, this deep-learning technique is successfully applied for solving different classes of singular ODEs, namely the well known second-order Lane-Emden equations, third order-order Emden-Fowler equations, and fourth-order Lane-Emden-Fowler equations. Two variants of PINNs technique are considered and compared. First, a minimization procedure is used to constrain the total loss function of the neural network, in which the equation residual is considered with some weight to form a physics-based loss and added to the training data loss that contains the initial/boundary conditions. Second, a specific choice of trial solutions ensuring these conditions as hard constraints is done in order to satisfy the differential equation, contrary to the first variant based on training data where the constraints appear as soft ones. Advantages and drawbacks of PINNs variants are highlighted.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.

Builds on

3 of 12 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  2. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 373
  3. 2023Solving differential equations using physics informed deep learning: a hand-on tutorial with benchmark testscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.