mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards dialect-inclusive recognition in a low-resource language: are balanced corpora the answer?

arXiv 2307.07295 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2023cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

ASR systems are generally built for the spoken 'standard', and their performance declines for non-standard dialects/varieties. This is a problem for a language like Irish, where there is no single spoken standard, but rather three major dialects: Ulster (Ul), Connacht (Co) and Munster (Mu). As a diagnostic to quantify the effect of the speaker's dialect on recognition performance, 12 ASR systems were trained, firstly using baseline dialect-balanced training corpora, and then using modified versions of the baseline corpora, where dialect-specific materials were either subtracted or added. Results indicate that dialect-balanced corpora do not yield a similar performance across the dialects: the Ul dialect consistently underperforms, whereas Mu yields lowest WERs. There is a close relationship between Co and Mu dialects, but one that is not symmetrical. These results will guide future corpus collection and system building strategies to optimise for cross-dialect performance equity.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.

Builds on

6 of 37 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  2. 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 589
  3. 2021Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 50
  4. 2017Multi-Dialect Speech Recognition With A Single Sequence-To-Sequence Modelcited by 37
  5. 2018Joint Modeling of Accents and Acoustics for Multi-Accent Speech Recognitioncited by 14
  6. 2021Integrating Categorical Features in End-to-End ASRcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

5 papers.